Sexual Offences with the recent case of footballer Ched Evans Matthew Stanbury Counsel Garden Court North Chambers
Section 41 False Complaints Sentencing Update.Forbes Sexual Risk Orders Section 41 and the Ched Evans Case What does Section 41 actually say? A ban on questions regarding previous sexual behaviour Exemptions.Relevant Issue.Not consent Consent is the Issue at or about the same time Behaviour “So similar” Rebuttal Refusal of Leave renders conviction unsafe Lose pedestrian to cutaway shot and return at a good point Use cutaways ,crowd shots and a bit of zoom to change gear as this is a long delivery The Crown v Chedwyn Evans S41.3.c.1 “Similar Behaviour” Evidence Relevance and Similarity Test The Fallout Calls for Reform to Section 41 Harriet Harman and Vera Baird QC Incompatability under Article 6 R v Garry Lloyd Jones Admissability Contempt of Court Appeal Section 41 , Sexuality and Subsection 4 Rebuttal Previous False Complaint Alhilly 2014 Non Defendant Bad Character S 100 Forbes Sentencing Issues Aggravating Features Abuse of Trust and the Court of Appeal Good Character Clampdown Sexual Risk Orders John O’Neill and the 24 Hour Police Notification
You can contact Matt Stanbury to discuss your caseload via clerks@gcnchambers.co.uk